Being Latino on Google Plus

The Latino side of town

by Daniel Cubias

I grew up in a state that was overwhelming white, in a city that was somewhat white, in a neighborhood that was barely white. The de facto segregation in my hometown meant that whole sections of the city could easily be identified as the barrio or the black neighborhood or the fledgling Asian district. It was geographically convenient to pinpoint where the white people weren’t, because they were so plentiful everywhere else.

But in the United States of 2011, it’s not so simple. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, “America’s neighborhoods became more integrated last year than during any time in at least a century.” This of course means we’ve achieved the mythical color-blind society where racism and ethnic conflict have been banished forever… well, not really.

You see, despite the positive move toward a more integrated society, the fact remains that “ethnic segregation in many parts of the U.S. persisted, particularly for Hispanics,” according to the Census Bureau. Yes, Latinos are still very likely to be segregated from other ethnic populations, and this has far-reaching consequences not only for Hispanics, but for America as well.

The Census Bureau states that one reason for the persistent segregation is because “large numbers of more recently arrived Hispanic immigrants are believed to be clustering together for social support.” As such, these areas are more likely to become ethnic enclaves, with all the struggles that immigrant communities have faced since the founding of America.

These issues include the continued economic stagnation of the Latino community, which is often cut off from the educational opportunities and networking benefits that the majority culture enjoys. Furthermore, making sure that all the Hispanics are in one tidy place strengthens an us-vs-them mentality, which can provide an excellent breeding ground for festering racism and mutual distrust.

Of course, some would argue that there are benefits to the continued prevalence of Latino-based neighborhoods. After all, Hispanic traditions are easier to pass down to subsequent generations if everybody in the area is Latino. And Hispanic political influence, already predicted to increase in the near future, could become more powerful as “new Hispanic-dominated districts … emerge,” according to the Census Bureau.

But at best, these points are consolation prizes. The truth is that segregation is a wince-inducing word for a reason. It has had a well-documented adverse effect on societies all over the world. America’s messy relationship with integration, of course, continues to the present day.

This time, however, it appears that Latinos are the ones who are being ghettoized. As such, it may be Hispanics who now feel the brunt of a separate and unequal society.

To learn more about Daniel Cubias, visit Hispanic Fanatic.

______________________________________________________________

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those
of the author and should not be understood to be shared by Being Latino, Inc.

______________________________________________________________

facebook twitter youtube images

______________________________________________________________

About Daniel Cubias

Daniel Cubias is a writer based in Los Angeles. In addition to Being Latino, his work can be found in such publications as the Huffington Post, Change.org, Aqui magazine, and his website, the Hispanic Fanatic. In addition, he has been published in many literary journals and won the occasional writing contest.

He is a Wisconsin native who still roots for his hometown Milwaukee Brewers. He is way too much into horror movies, and he is inexplicably still unable to tune his guitar properly.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and should not be understood to be shared by Being Latino, Inc.

Comments

  1. JNR says:

    “The truth is that segregation is a wince-inducing word for a reason. It has had a well-documented adverse effect on societies all over the world. America’s messy relationship with integration, of course, continues to the present day.”

    This is a great line. I may add that the political gains of residential segregation are overstated. Latinos packed in districts will have less political clout than a substantial number of Latinos spread over several districts. There is a large literature on representation supporting this notion that minority-influence districts are preferable over minority-majority districts. Residential segregation makes it more difficult to achieve this.

  2. Jennifer says:

    Great article – and I couldn’t agree more with “(t)he truth is that segregation is a wince-inducing word for a reason. It has had a well-documented adverse effect on societies all over the world.” I absolutely believe that we should carry on our Latino-traditions and out culture – but I don’t believe in segregation. Thank you for this :)

Speak Your Mind

*